Rigorous. Real. Trusted.

Android Malware
Detection Test

Independent assessment of 9 consumer security solutions against 1,099 real-world Android malware samples.

Test Period April 2026
Report Version 1.1
Published 2026.07.08
9
Products Tested
1,099
Malware Samples
499
Clean Applications
9
5-Star Awards
5-Star Monthly Award
5-Star Monthly Award · April 2026
All 9 tested consumer security products achieved 5-star ratings. Avast, Avira, ESET, Kaspersky, McAfee, and NortonLifeLock achieved a perfect score of 100.00 with zero false positives.
Navigation

Table of Contents

v1.1 · 2026.07.08 AMTSO compliance review completed; report updated to reflect confirmed compliance status.
v1.0 · 2026.06.09 Initial publication of the April 2026 Consumer Android Malware Detection Test report.
Chapter 01

Background

Android is a mobile operating system developed by Google, based on a modified version of the Linux kernel and other open-source software. It is the dominant OS for a wide array of devices including smartphones, tablets, televisions (Android TV), and automotive systems (Android Auto).

As of early 2026, Android commands approximately 72.5% of the global mobile operating system market, powering an estimated 3.9 billion active devices worldwide. Its dominance is even more pronounced in key emerging markets — in countries such as India, Brazil, Indonesia, and Turkey, Android's market share exceeds 85%. Global smartphone shipments reached 1.25 billion units in 2025, and while the market faces headwinds from component shortages in 2026, the installed base of Android devices continues to represent the world's largest computing platform. This massive, fragmented user base makes the Android ecosystem a uniquely attractive target for cybercriminals.

The threat landscape heading into 2026 has matured significantly. Android devices now account for 94% of all mobile-specific malware detections globally. Attackers are no longer simply throwing malware at users — they are building ecosystems, coordinating multi-stage fraud pipelines, and exploiting user trust at scale.

Financial Fraud via Advanced Malware

Banking trojans continue to dominate the mobile threat landscape. Attacks from families such as Android.Banker increased by over 150% in Q1 2025, and Kaspersky reported a 48% rise in Android attacks compared to the second half of 2024. These threats use overlay attacks to create fake login screens mimicking legitimate banking apps, and advanced techniques such as app virtualization to capture credentials and one-time passwords without arousing suspicion.

NFC Relay and Contactless Payment Theft

Android NFC malware incidents rose approximately 87% year-over-year in 2025. Newer strains such as RatON combine NFC relay attacks with remote access trojans (RATs) and overlay techniques to automate fraudulent transactions directly from the victim's device — intercepting card data during contactless payment gestures and relaying it to attacker-controlled devices in real time. RatON was discovered on the Google Play Store in early 2026.

Smishing as a Primary Delivery Vector

SMS-based phishing ("smishing") has become a dominant initial attack vector. Between April and May 2025, smishing attacks spiked by an alarming 692%. Users receive deceptive messages disguised as delivery notifications, tax refunds, or bank alerts, leading to the installation of spyware or banking trojans. The FBI and international cybersecurity agencies have since issued coordinated warnings about the scale and sophistication of these campaigns.

Data Espionage and Extortion

Spyware incidents rose by 147% in 2025, with Kaspersky telemetry separately noting a ~51% year-over-year increase in spyware detections. Once deployed, these tools operate silently to exfiltrate personal data — contact lists, photos, private messages, and real-time location — then monetize it through blackmail, identity theft, or darknet markets.

AI-Assisted and System-Level Attacks

A key 2026 development is the use of AI tools to generate adaptive malware that evades signature-based detection. Attackers also abuse Android's Accessibility Services: once granted, these permissions allow malware to automate fraudulent transactions, harvest credentials across any installed app, and disable security software. In 2025, adware volumes nearly doubled, driven by aggressive families like MobiDash, while Banking Trojans and spyware have outpaced traditional nuisances to become the dominant threat category.

OS fragmentation remains critical: Android 12 and older versions — no longer receiving security patches — collectively account for nearly 30% of the active installed base. Supply chain weaknesses persist, with counterfeit devices in some markets arriving pre-loaded with malware. To protect users from this highly organized and rapidly evolving threat landscape, dedicated Android security applications must be continuously evaluated against real-world threats. This test is designed to independently assess the efficiency of consumer security solutions for the Android OS.

Chapter 02

Test Process & Test Software

This section outlines the methodology used for the test conducted in April 2026. The test environment and procedures were designed to ensure objectivity and reproducibility.

Test Device
Samsung Galaxy S22
Operating System
Android 14
Malware Samples
1,099 in-the-wild
Clean Applications
499 installers
Test Environment
Test Procedure
  1. Sample Collection: A comprehensive test set was compiled, consisting of 1,099 recent, in-the-wild malware samples and 499 legitimate, clean application installers gathered from threat intelligence feeds and verified sources.
  2. Software Installation: Each security application was installed on the test device using its default configuration settings.
  3. Signature Updates: Prior to each scan, each application and its virus definitions were updated to the latest available versions to ensure peak detection capability.
  4. Static Analysis (On-Demand Scan): A full file system scan was initiated. All detections and any false positives were recorded.
  5. Dynamic Analysis (Behavioral Test): Each malicious sample not detected during the static scan was manually installed and executed. Behavioral or on-execution detections were recorded.
  6. False Positive Verification: Clean applications were scanned only — not installed or executed — serving exclusively to measure the false positive rate.
Tested Products — Software & Versions
VendorSoftwareVersion
AhnLabAhnLab V3 Mobile Security3.12.2.1(Build 4264)
AvastAvast Mobile Security26.6.0.260325387
AviraAvira Antivirus Security for Android7.31.0 build No. 260128310
Dr.WebDr.Web Mobile Security Suite12.9.10(2)
ESETESET Mobile Securityv. 11.2.7.0-15
KasperskyKaspersky Premium for Android11.131.4.15499
McAfeeMcAfee Mobile Security10.4.0.570
NortonLifeLockNorton 360 (Norton Mobile Security)26.5.0.260326223
Total DefenseTotal Defense Mobile Security16.4.3
Chapter 03

Tested Results

Android Malware Detection Rate — Consumer Products
April 2026 · Testing Ground Labs · Total Samples: 1,099
Avast
100.00%
100.00
Avira
100.00%
100.00
ESET
100.00%
100.00
Kaspersky
100.00%
100.00
McAfee
100.00%
100.00
NortonLifeLock
100.00%
100.00
AhnLab
99.91%
99.91
Total Defense
99.91%
99.91
Dr.Web
99.73%
99.73
VendorTotalMissedDetectedDetection RateFalse PositivesFinal Score
Avast109901099100.00%0100.00
Avira109901099100.00%0100.00
ESET109901099100.00%0100.00
Kaspersky109901099100.00%0100.00
McAfee109901099100.00%0100.00
NortonLifeLock109901099100.00%0100.00
AhnLab10991109899.91%099.91
Total Defense10991109899.91%099.91
Dr.Web10993109699.73%099.73

For each security solution, a Final Score is calculated once the full test is performed:

Final Score = (Detection %) × 100 − 0.2 × FP

Final ScoreMonthly Award
98.00 – 100.00★★★★★  5-star rating
95.00 – 97.99★★★★  4-star rating
90.00 – 94.99★★★  3-star rating
Chapter 04

Test Summary & Monthly Award

All 9 tested products achieved 5-star ratings in the April 2026 Android Malware Detection Test from Testing Ground Labs. Avast, Avira, ESET, Kaspersky, McAfee, and NortonLifeLock achieved a perfect score of 100.00 with zero false positives across 1,099 malware samples.

★★★★★  5-Star Monthly Award — April 2026
Avast
Avira
ESET
Kaspersky
McAfee
NortonLifeLock
AhnLab
Total Defense
Dr.Web

Gold highlight = Perfect Score (100.00) with zero false positives

5 Stars Consumer Certified Consumer
Products achieving 5-star ratings are entitled to display the Testing Ground Labs Monthly Award badge on their marketing materials, subject to the Rights Statement set out in this report.
Chapter 05

Compliance

amtso The cybersecurity industry's testing standard community CONFIRMED COMPLIANT www.amtso.org

This test was made in accordance with the requirements of the AMTSO Testing Protocol Standard v.1.3 (https://www.amtso.org/standards/) and is confirmed by AMTSO as compliant with the Standard.

Chapter 06

Rights Statement

Unless otherwise stated, Testing Ground Labs (hereinafter referred to as "TG Labs"), owns the copyright of this report. Without prior written consent of TG Labs, no other organization or individual shall have the right to alter the contents of this report and use it for commercial purposes by any means (including but not limited to transmission, dissemination, reproduction, excerpt, etc.).

Unless otherwise stated, TG Labs shall be the rightful owner of the trademarks and service marks used in the report. Any action of infringing upon the legal rights of TG Labs is prohibited. TG Labs shall have the right to pursue the legal liability of the infringer in accordance with the law.

Chapter 07

Disclaimer

Before using this report issued by Testing Ground Labs (hereinafter "TG Labs"), please read and understand the following terms and conditions (the "Disclaimer") carefully, including provisions that limit or exclude TG Labs' liability and that restrict the rights of users. Use of this report constitutes acceptance of, and agreement to, all terms and conditions set forth herein.

  1. The report is provided by TG Labs; all contents are provided for reference purposes only and shall not be construed as a recommendation, invitation, or warranty to choose, purchase, or use any products mentioned herein. TG Labs does not guarantee the absolute accuracy or completeness of the report's contents; readers should not rely solely on this report or substitute its findings for their own independent judgment.
  2. The contents contained herein is the judgment made by TG Labs to the product characteristics as of the date the report was published. TG Labs reserves the right to issue future reports containing different content or conclusions and is under no obligation to update this report or notify readers of any such updates.
  3. The report may contain links to other websites provided solely for the readers' convenience. The contents of linked websites are not part of this report. TG Labs accepts no liability, direct or indirect, for any damages or losses arising from readers' access to or reliance on such linked websites.
  4. TG Labs may have existing or future business relationships with companies whose products are mentioned in this report, but is under no obligation to disclose such relationships to readers.
  5. Receipt of this report does not constitute the formation of any business or client relationship between the reader and TG Labs. TG Labs does not accept any legal liability as the readers' customer.
  6. All products tested by TG Labs were procured through official and lawful channels. The findings of this report apply only to products obtained through equivalent channels, and not to products acquired through unofficial or unlawful means.
  7. This report may reference trademarks, images, or intellectual property owned by third parties. If you believe your rights have been infringed, please contact TG Labs promptly.

TG Labs reserves the right to interpret, amend, and update this Disclaimer at any time.